Introduction to partial derivatives (article) | Khan Academy (2024)

• (Ordinary) derivatives
• Multivariable functions
• Graphs of multivariable function

• For a multivariable function, like $f(x,y)=x^{2}y$‍, computing partial derivatives looks something like this:

• This swirly-d symbol, $\partial$‍, often called "del", is used to distinguish partial derivatives from ordinary single-variable derivatives. Or, should I say ... to differentiate them.

• The reason for a new type of derivative is that when the input of a function is made up of multiple variables, we want to see how the function changes as we let just one of those variables change while holding all the others constant.

• With respect to three-dimensional graphs, you can picture the partial derivative ${\displaystyle \frac{\partial f}{\partial x}}$‍ by slicing the graph of $f$‍ with a plane representing a constant $y$‍-value and measuring the slope of the resulting curve along the cut.

We'll assume you are familiar with the ordinary derivative ${\displaystyle \frac{df}{dx}}$‍ from single variable calculus. I actually quite like this notation for the derivative, because you can interpret it as follows:

• Interpret $dx$‍ as "a very tiny change in $x$‍".

• Interpret $df$‍ as "a very tiny change in the output of $f$‍", where it is understood that this tiny change is whatever results from the tiny change $dx$‍ to the input.

In fact, I think this intuitive feel for the symbol ${\displaystyle \frac{df}{dx}}$‍ is one of the most useful takeaways from single-variable calculus, and when you really start feeling it in your bones, most of the concepts around derivatives start to click.

For example, when you apply it to the graph of $f$‍, you can interpret this "ratio" ${\displaystyle \frac{df}{dx}}$‍ as the rise-over-run slope of the graph of $f$‍, which depends on the point where you started.

Consider some function with a two-dimensional input and a one-dimensional output.

There's nothing stopping us from writing the same expression, ${\displaystyle \frac{df}{dx}}$‍, and interpreting it the same way:

• $dx$‍ can still represent a tiny change in the variable $x$‍, which is now just one component of our input.

• $df$‍ can still represent the resulting change to the output of the function $f(x,y)$‍.

However, this ignores the fact that there is another input variable $y$‍. The input space now has multiple dimensions, so we can change the input in many directions other than the $x$‍-direction. For example, what about changing $y$‍ slightly by some small value $dy$‍? Now if we re-interpret $df$‍ to represent the tiny change to the function that this $dy$‍ shift brings about, we would have a different derivative ${\displaystyle \frac{df}{dy}}$‍.

Neither one of these derivatives tells the full story of how our function $f(x,y)$‍ changes when its input changes slightly, so we call them partial derivatives. To emphasize the difference, we no longer use the letter $d$‍ to indicate tiny changes, but instead introduce a newfangled symbol $\partial$‍ to do the trick, writing each partial derivative as ${\displaystyle \frac{\partial f}{\partial x}}$‍, ${\displaystyle \frac{\partial f}{\partial y}}$‍, etc.

You read the symbol ${\displaystyle \frac{\partial f}{\partial x}}$‍ out loud by saying "the partial derivative of $f$‍ with respect to $x$‍".

Consider this function:

Suppose I asked you to evaluate ${\displaystyle \frac{\partial f}{\partial x}}$‍, the partial derivative with respect to $x$‍, at the input $(3,2)$‍.

"What? But I haven't learned how yet!"

Don't worry, it's mostly just the same mechanics as an ordinary derivative.

From the introduction above, you should know that this is asking about the rate at which the output of $f$‍ changes as we nudge the $x$‍-component of the input slightly, perhaps moving from $(3,2)$‍ to $(3.01,2)$‍.

Since we only care about movement in the $x$‍-direction, we might as well treat the $y$‍-value as a constant. In fact, we can just plug in $y=2$‍ ahead of time before computing any derivatives:

Now, asking how $f$‍ changes in response to a small shift in $x$‍ is just an ordinary, single-variable derivative.

Now suppose I asked you to find ${\displaystyle \frac{\partial f}{\partial x}}$‍, but I didn't ask you to evaluate it at a specific point. In other words, you should give me new multivariable function which takes any point $(x,y)$‍ as its input and tells me what the rate of change of $f$‍ near that point is as we move purely in the $x$‍-direction.

You can start the same way, treating the $y$‍ value as a constant. However, this time, you cannot plug in an actual constant value, like $y=2$‍. Instead, pretend that $y$‍ is ​constant and take the derivative:

Or rather, since to emphasize that this is a multivariable function, we use the symbol $\partial$‍ instead of $d$‍:

As a sanity check, you can plug in $(3,2)$‍ to see that we get the same result as above.

"So, what's the difference between ${\displaystyle \frac{d}{dx}}$‍ and ${\displaystyle \frac{\partial }{\partial x}}$‍? They seem to be used the same way."

Honestly, as far as I'm concerned, there's not really a difference between these operations. You could be pedantic and say one is only defined for single variable functions. But as far as intuition and computation go, they are one and the same, and the difference is just meant to clarify what type of function is being differentiated.

Consider this function:

$f(x,y)={\displaystyle \frac{1}{5}}(x^2-2xy)+3$‍,

Here is a video showing its graph rotating, just to get a feel for the three-dimensional nature of it.

Think about the partial derivative of $f$‍ with respect to $x$‍, perhaps evaluated at the point $(2,0)$‍.

In terms of the graph, what does the value of this expression tell us about the behavior of the function $f$‍ at the point $(2,0)$‍?

The first step when computing this value is to treat $y$‍ as a constant. Specifically, if we are limiting our view to what happens at the point $(2,0)$‍, we should only look at the set of points where $y=0$‍. In three-dimensional space, this set is plane perpendicular to the $y$‍-axis, passing through the origin.

This plane $y=0$‍, shown in white, slices into the graph of $f(x,y)$‍ along a parabolic curve, shown faintly in red. We can interpret ${\displaystyle \frac{\partial f}{\partial x}}$‍ as giving the slope of a tangent line to this curve. Why? Because $\partial x$‍ is a slight nudge in the $x$‍-direction, the run, and $\partial f$‍ is the resulting change in the $z$‍-direction, the rise.

What about ${\displaystyle \frac{\partial f}{\partial y}}$‍ at that same point $(2,0)$‍? The points where $x=2$‍ also make up a plane, but this time it's a plane perpendicular to the $x$‍-axis intersecting the point $x=2$‍. This slices the graph along a new curve, and ${\displaystyle \frac{\partial f}{\partial y}}$‍ will give the slope of that new curve.

Here are some of the phrases you might hear in reference to this ${\displaystyle \frac{\partial f}{\partial x}}$‍ operation:

• "The partial derivative of $f$‍ with respect to $x$‍"
• "Del f, del x"
• "Partial f, partial x"
• "The partial derivative (of $f$‍) in the $x$‍-direction"

In the same way that people sometimes prefer to write $f^{\prime }$‍ instead of ${\displaystyle \frac{df}{dx}}$‍, we have the following notation:

While it's common to refer to the partial symbol $\partial$‍ as "del", this can be confusing because "del" is also the name of the Nabla symbol $\mathrm{\nabla }$‍, which we will introduce in the next article.

Although thinking of $dx$‍ or $\partial x$‍ as really tiny changes in the value of $x$‍ is a useful intuition, it is healthy to occasionally step back and remember that defining things precisely requires introducing limits. After all, what specific small value would $\partial x$‍ be? One one hundredth? One one millionth? ${10}^{-{10}^{10}}$‍?

The point of calculus is that we don't use any one tiny number, but instead consider all possible values and analyze what tends to happen as they approach a limiting value. The single variable derivative, for example, is defined like this:

• $h$‍ represents the "tiny value" that we intuitively think of as $dx$‍.

• The $h\to 0$‍ under the limit indicates that we care about very small values of $h$‍, those approaching $0$‍.

• $f(x_0+h)-f(x_0)$‍ is the change in the output that results from adding $h$‍ to the input, which is what we think of as $df$‍.

Formally defining the partial derivative looks almost identical. If $f(x,y,\dots )$‍ is a function with multiple inputs, here's how that looks:

Similarly, here's how the partial derivative with respect to $y$‍ looks:

The point is that $h$‍, which represents a tiny tweak to the input, is added to different input variables depending on which partial derivative we are taking.

People will often refer to this as the limit definition of a partial derivative.

Reflection question: How can we think about this limit definition in the context of the graphical interpretation above? What is $h$‍? What does it look like for $h\to 0$‍?

• For a multivariable function, like $f(x,y)=x^{2}y$‍, computing partial derivatives looks something like this:

• This swirly-d symbol $\partial$‍, often called "del", is used to distinguish partial derivatives from ordinary single-variable derivatives.

• The reason for a new type of derivative is that when the input of a function is made up of multiple variables, we want to see how the function changes as we let just one of those variables change while holding all the others constant.

• With respect to three-dimensional graphs, you can picture the partial derivative ${\displaystyle \frac{\partial f}{\partial x}}$‍ by slicing the graph of $f$‍ with a plane representing a constant $y$‍-value, and measuring the slope of the resulting cut.